EDUC 5313 - Week 2 Blog
EDUC 5313 – Week 2 Blog
Part 1: Authentic Intellectual Work (AIW) in
education emphasizes meaningful, real-world learning that encourages students
to engage in higher order thinking and problem solving. It prioritizes deep
understanding and relevance to students’ lives, equipping them with skills they
can apply beyond the classroom.
AIW differs from traditional education by prioritizing a
deeper understanding and mastery of skills rather than rushing to cover a broad
range of content. While traditional assessments often focus on testing
memorization and repetition of information, AIW promotes creativity and uses performance-based
assessment to evaluate student's ability to solve problems and apply their
knowledge.
According to Newmann et al. (2007), the three key criteria
of AIW are the construction of knowledge, disciplined inquiry, and value beyond
school (pp. 4-5). The first criteria, construction of knowledge, requires
students to apply foundational skills and understanding to tackle more complex
problems. Through analysis and critical thinking, students build knowledge
actively rather than passively absorbing facts, thereby creating deeper
understanding.
Disciplined inquiry, the second criteria of AIW, encourages
students to engage in deeper thinking by building on foundational knowledge. It
involves thoroughly investigating specific problems to develop a deeper
understanding and using detailed communication to justify and convey
explanations and reasoning.
Finally, the third criteria, value beyond school, emphasizes
that the work students produce has significance beyond the classroom, helping
them develop skills that prepare them for future careers. Intellectual
challenges rooted in real world contexts are often more meaningful to students
than those created solely for classroom instruction.
One specific example of AIW in my adult radiography program
is lab competency simulations. Students apply their classroom learning by
collaborating with classmates and practicing hands on positioning in the lab.
Once I determine they have mastered the skill they perform the examination for
competency, using a classmate as their patient while I observe and provide
feedback. These skills are then further developed and refined in the clinical
setting.
Part 2: One recommendation to close the use divide
mentioned in the National Educational Technology Plan (NETP) was to “build
public-private partnerships with local businesses, higher education
institutions, and nonprofit organizations to help students access edtech-
enabled hands-on learning and work-based learning experiences” (NETP, 2024, p.
11). Oklahoma State University in Oklahoma City has recently implemented a Polytech
initiative that aligns with these recommendations. Through partnerships with
various healthcare facilities, students gain hands-on experience in the
clinical setting. We also support and monitor students’ work-based learning
experiences. Our program boasts a 100% job placement rate within six months of
graduation, with many students already working in the field while still
completing the program. As diagnostic medical imaging is now fully digital,
students must learn to adapt to many different software interfaces to succeed
in the profession.
Part 3: AIW Framework and the Triple E framework are both approaches
that aim to improve the quality and relevance of education. While AIW
emphasizes deep thinking and knowledge construction to equip students for real-world
challenges, the Triple E Framework centers on integrating technology into
education and evaluates how affectively technology engages students, enhances
the learning process, and extends learning beyond the classroom. Both
approaches share similarities in that they encourage higher order thinking and
active engagement with content, prioritize real-world application, making
learning meaningful to students lives, and support the idea that education
should foster a deeper understanding and skill development beneficial beyond
the classroom.
References:
Gaer, S.
& Reyes, K. (2022). Finally, Some Guidance! Using the Triple E Framework to
Shape Technology Integration, Adult Literacy Education, 4 (3-34).
Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Carmichael,
D. L. (2007). Authentic instruction and assessment: Common standards
for rigor and relevance in teaching academic subjects. State of Iowa
Department of Education.
Office of Educational Technology.
(2024). A Call to Action to Close the Technology Access, Design, and Use
Divides: National Educational Technology Plan. Department of Education.
Retrieved from: https://tech.ed.gov/netp/
I really enjoyed reading your post! You did a great job explaining how AIW prioritizes real-world learning and the development of higher-order thinking skills. I completely agree with you that AIW moves away from the traditional focus on memorization and pushes students to engage in deeper experiences. Your example of the radiography program is a great illustration of AIW. The hands-on lap competency simulations allow students to apply their knowledge, which is so valuable! I also thought it was great how you connected the NETP's recommendation for public-private partnerships. And the 100% job placement rate really speaks to the effectiveness of the program. I also liked how you connected AIW with the Triple E Framework. Both approaches centered on making learning more relevant and engaging. It's clear these frameworks complement each other. Great post!
ReplyDelete