EDUC 5313 - Week 5 Blog
EDUC 5313 – Week 5 Blog
Part 1:
The article reviewed
for this week’s blog assignment was one written by Craig et al. (2022) studying
the use of professional development (PD) opportunities to support teachers in
implementing the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework. The UDL
framework is designed to increase student engagement and create a flexible
learning environment that accommodates the diverse needs of the students in
today’s inclusive classrooms (Craig et al., 2022, p. 23).
While UDL is frequently
referenced in many new federal policies and legislative initiatives, there is limited
research on the role of professional development in facilitating its
implementation (Craig et al., 2022, p.23). Without dedicated training and
continuous support, educators may find it challenging to effectively apply UDL
principles in their classrooms. This challenge is further compounded by the increasing
time constraints on teachers, making it even more difficult to effectively
implement new instructional frameworks.
Craig et al.
(2022) conducted a “quasi-experimental study to examine the effect of a
weeklong PD program, called the Institute, on teachers’ implementation of the
UDL framework” (p.23). This study compared seventy-three district teachers who
attended the Institute with seventy teachers who did not, using mixed-model
repeated-measures analyses (Craig, 2022, p. 22).
The study
concluded that the Institute, a weeklong evidence-based PD program, effectively
enhanced teachers’ implementation of the UDL framework in their classrooms by
providing support and reinforcing their skills (Craig et al., 2022). One unfortunate
finding of this study is that, despite its proven effectiveness, many districts
allocate limited resources for professional development, making it challenging
to support their teachers implementing the UDL framework.
Part 2:
The CAST
Universal Design for Learning website provides an in-depth overview of the UDL
framework, offering easily accessible guidelines and practical suggestions for
implementation. The framework is divided into three domains; Engagement, Representation,
and Action & Expression, each further categorized into Access, Support and Executive
Function to guide UDL implementation (CAST, 2024).
While each
category is important, two strategies particularly align with the lesson plan I
am currently developing: 8.3 – Foster collaboration, interdependence, and
collective learning and 2.1 – Clarify vocabulary, symbols, and language structure
(CAST, 2024). The lesson plan covers complex concepts, and I believe
incorporating collaboration will enhance student engagement, while clarifying vocabulary
will help bridge the gap between prior knowledge and its practical application in
the lab and clinic.
Under the Engagement
domain, strategy 8.3 suggests creating teams and using prompts or protocols
that guide learning while encouraging questions for deeper understanding of
concepts (CAST, 2024). These strategies align well with the laboratory setting
in the radiology program. In the lab, students are assigned tasks to apply
classroom concepts, and they enjoy collaborating with their classmates to test
their understanding. The instructor guided lab fosters an interactive learning environment
where students are encouraged to ask questions to ensure they fully grasp the
assignment.
Strategy 2.1 under
the Representation domain suggests pre-teaching vocabulary and symbols to promote
connection to prior knowledge (CAST, 2022). The primary purpose of the laboratory
setting in the radiology program is to provide hands-on skill implementation while
reinforcing prior knowledge learned in the classroom. Students receive guided
instructions for laboratory experiments designed to strengthen these
connections and enhance their understanding of key concepts.
Part 3:
Digital learning
tools are invaluable assets to both students and educators. However, as highlighted
in the U.S. Department of Education’s 2024 National Educational Technology Plan
(NETP), many digital resources remain underutilized, limiting their potential
impact on teaching and learning (NETP, 2024). This document emphasizes that the
active use of technology involves utilizing digital tools for learning rather
than simply consuming information (NETP, 2024).
When used
effectively, technology enhances engagement and empowers students to take
ownership of their learning, preparing them for success in a technology-driven
world. Unfortunately, just as addressed in the Craig et al. (2022) study, teachers
are generally overwhelmed, and implementing UDL practices without proper professional
development and ongoing support can be challenging. “Just as student need time
and space to learn, grow, and reflect on their learning, so do educators”
(NETP, 2024, p. 24).
References:
CAST
(2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0.
Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org
Office of Educational Technology.
(2024). A Call to Action to Close the Technology Access, Design, and Use
Divides: National Educational Technology Plan. Department of Education. http://tech.ed.gov
Stephanie
L. Craig, Sean J. Smith & Bruce B. Frey (2022) Professional development
with universal design for learning: supporting teachers as learners to increase
the implementation of UDL, Professional Development in Education, 48(1),
22-37. DOI:10.1080/19415257.2019.1685563
Hello Caryn, thank you for reviewing the article regarding professional development for implementing the Universal Design for Learning. You bring up such a good point the challenge that teachers can and do feel if there is not effective training on UDL framework. I also see your point that the 2024 NETP emphasizes the underutilization of technology and therefore increases the digital divide between active and passive learning with technology. As educators, I agree that we should have proper training and engaging exploration with technological tools and the UDL framework before we implement them in our learning so we use them as meaningful and purposeful learning.
ReplyDeleteTia Pratt
Hello Caryn, I completely agree with the lack of professional development opportunities for educators implementing digital tools. In radiography education, our focus has traditionally been on radiography equipment and healthcare software, making the integration of educational technology a relatively new challenge. Without proper training, educators struggle to effectively utilize these tools in ways that enhance student engagement and learning. Structured PD sessions, mentorship programs, and hands-on workshops could provide educators with the skills needed to confidently apply digital tools within the UDL framework. These efforts would benefit students by improving engagement, comprehension, and clinical readiness and support radiography educators by increasing instructional efficiency and confidence.
ReplyDelete